Log in

No account? Create an account
Star Goddess

the_changeling in attachedmumsuk

Baby returned by court order

At least it's getting about that if social services do take your baby without a court order in place (which they can't ever do, as no one ever does that in the UK, obviously) you immediately go to court and demand the baby back!

If only the Essex baby's family had known to push for this, the baby would have been back on the breast that evening...


Court orders return of new baby 
A teenage mother from Nottingham whose new-born child was taken from her by social services is to seek damages.

The boy was born to the 18-year-old, who had just left local authority care, but taken two hours later by social services without a court order.

Hours later, Mr Justice Munby at the High Court said no baby could be removed "as the result of a decision taken by officials in some room".

The woman's solicitor Stuart Luke said she would lodge a claim for damages.

'Birth plan'

He said she faced the prosect of "an application by the local authority social services for an interim care order, which will be vigorously contested".

Mr Justice Munby said that without the appropriate order and given that the mother was still in hospital, mother and child should be reunited.

Describing the situation as "most unfortunate", he said officials involved in the case "should have known better".

The boy was born healthy and taken from his mother about two hours after his birth without an order having been made.

Hospital staff were apparently shown a "birth plan" prepared by local authority social services.

'Unfortunate removal'

The plan said the mother, who had a troubled childhood and suffered from mental health problems, was to be separated from the child, and no contact allowed without supervision by social workers.

The judge said the removal of a child could only be lawful if a police constable was taking action to protect a child, or there was a court order in place.

Mr Luke said the mother would be launching a claim for damages against social services officials "arising out of the unfortunate removal of her child without lawful authority shortly after his birth".

The judge ordered the council to prepare a comprehensive plan setting out their proposals to assist the mother as she had recently left local authority care, by no later than 8 February.

Story from BBC NEWS:

Published: 2008/01/30 21:25:14 GMT